Showing posts with label David Miliband. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Miliband. Show all posts

Thursday, September 30, 2010

Layer 357 . . . Carlos Santana, Clapton, Great Guitarists, Higher Consciousness, Divine Communication, Cleaning Out the Stables, Fairness, Will Hutton and the Road Ahead

.
Carlos

Listening to Carlos Santana play is a good way to start any day, To hear him playing on the news-heavy Today programme on R4 this morning was an unexpected treat. Carlos is a phenomenon. His style is unique. Who else plays what can only be described as Latino blues/rock? From the very first time I heard Santana's first album - played at volume in a Ferrari howling along the autoroute from Provence to Paris back at the end of the 60's - I've loved Carlos, his band and his music. I may have mentioned this before.

Carlos is in Britain to play at the O2, and has a new album called Guitar Heaven. (See Layers 354, 280, 279, 196, 180 ) He played, and shot to fame, at Woodstock in 1969. It's been quite a journey. The fortunate few who have a ticket to hear him play at the O2 tomorrow, for his only London gig on his current European tour, will no doubt have an unforgettable experience.

http://www.santana.com/tour/

On the Today programme he spoke about the 60's counterculture ideals - peace, love, and the end of war. He described his Woodstock experience as 'deliciously scary and exciting', and his music as 'African rhythms in a different rainbow of colours and sounds - sensual dance rhythms'.

Carlos recalls the Beatles' 'Revolver' album as marking the beginning - 'the ground zero' - of a 'consciousness revolution'. "Music and art that is genuine, heartfelt, true and earnest makes you believe or at least dream that you can make a difference to the world." On the other hand, "Religion produces the opposite of a higher consciousness".

The interviewer said Carlos is in the very top category of guitarists, alongside Hendrix and Clapton. (Should have added David Gilmour)

The track featured in Today's interview was "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" - already mentioned in Layer 354. On YouTube and Spotify.

http://www.milagrofoundation.org/

................................................

Released this week, and already available on Spotify, is Eric's new album - 'Clapton'. Check it out - it's his first since 2006.

http://www.ericclapton.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Clapton

......................................................

In Our Time - The Delphic Oracle.
Melvyn Bragg

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00txj8d

A divine communication?

....................................................

The Shadow Cabinet and the Way Ahead

So - David Mili has decided he's not going to stand for election to the shadow cabinet. Quelle surprise!

This is good. As the Heir to Blair he's really not wanted on voyage any more, especially as he's yet to acknowledge the bad stuff that New Labour did, unlike his brother.

The really great thing about Ed's speech was its very honest listing of all New Labour's failings. We had to have that before we could start believing in the fresh start and the New Generation stuff.

The one thing lacking in Ed's speech - the really glaring omission - was any mention of the bad stuff they did to the public services with their targets and league tables and their bureaucratic market-oriented MBA management culture. This was particularly so for education. This has still to be dealt with.

The other stuff was there, though - much to TweedleDave's dismay:

the lack of any care about inequality, increasing the gap between rich and poor,  failure to re-regulate the City and financial services, failure to prevent the property bubble, continuing to privatise public services, PFI, no concern for work-life balance, damaging civil liberties, failure to support a proper solution for Palestine, the Iraq nightmare, failure to introduce Proportional Representation or at least the Alternative Vote, failure to complete reform of the House of Lords, failure to promote proper businesses and industries, and above all any care about redistributing prosperity, tackling low pay, and introducing a living wage.

The basic failure of New Labour was its adoption of Thatcherism Lite, and its repudiation of socialism and any concern with building a fairer society.

Will Hutton has a new book just out which focuses on the central issue of 'fairness'.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00txgs3

As Britain grapples with the recession and a vast public debt crisis, what direction should the country take? The economics commentator Will Hutton asserts that Britain’s fundamental economic, political and social problems can only be tackled by increasing levels of fairness. In his book, Them and Us, Hutton argues that Britain has paid a high price for running its capitalism unfairly and sets out an approach which he believes combines libertarian and egalitarian principles. The financial, media and political systems need reforming, and the required changes should be based on a firm moral framework with fairness as the guiding principle.

Them and Us: Changing Britain – Why We Need a Fair Society is published by Little, Brown.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/this_week/8132298.stm

The way ahead had been identified. We now need a detailed road map.
.

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Layer 167 Brown's Preservation, Market Regulation, Making the Unconventional Conventional, Justice, and a Journey In Moral Reasoning.

.
So the PLP has decided that Brown should stay. David Miliband was on the radio this morning explaining why this is so. He's such a patronising little git. He admitted that millions of people had wanted to vote for Labour last week but had withheld their votes. He said these people seemed to think the party had “forgotten them”. So he and his pals now want to “remember them”? Really? This is me you're talking about, you posh little twerp! I don't want to be remembered! I want my party to be back in the hands of people who understand why it exists.

It's still beyond him to admit that New Labour, a cuckoo in the nest of the Labour Party, which he was involved in creating as a 'special advisor' to Blair, has completely fucked up and betrayed its main purpose, which has always been to govern in order to create a social democracy in which there's social justice, greater equality, the abolition of poverty, etc.

So he now wants the government to take decisions that are the “equivalent of owning two thirds of Lloyds Bank”, which he says was “unthinkable” even a year ago. Unthinkable by you and the rest of your pals, you twat. Progressives and radicals have been advocating such things for decades. What's he ever done to even suggest, let alone fight for, such ideas - to make them part of our political discourse?

It wasn't only that most of the brainwashed electorate deemed such nationalisation or part-nationalisation to be the crackpot ideas of the “looney left” - he himself would have said so, and probably did say so, till the financial system went belly up and they were forced to act – to bail out capitalism.

Little Dave now says that it's Labour's job to “make the unconventional conventional”. That was ALWAYS it's job, you pillock!

He said, “Don't tell me that markets don't need to be regulated”. Oh dear. We've been telling him and his mates that markets, especially financial markets, DO need to be regulated, and saying so for fucking years. That's what Keynesian economics is all about – intervention in the markets and curbing the excesses and failures of the market system. It was brainbox Milly and his chums who thought there was “no alternative” to the Chicago School, free market globalisation and voodoo economics.

No matter. Let's let bygones be bygones. Let's assume Little Dave and NuLabour have wised up and now want to make the unthinkable thinkable, the unconventional conventional, and are now determined to pursue proper socialist policies through to the end of this Parliament.

----------------------------

Polly Toynbee, for one, isn't holding her breath.

Dazed, gripped by delusion, the party tonight bottled it.


There is a bold, reviving leader's speech that might yet salvage Labour. It just can't be delivered by Gordon Brown.

Now things couldn't get worse, at 15% and below Ukip. How can Wales have gone Tory? Good grief, only 8% voted Labour in the entire south-east.

Gordon Brown is not Labour's only problem, but he is the greatest obstacle to recovery.

Crack up, collapse, catastrophe, the nightmare is real.

Merkel and Sarkozy won by taking more radical social democratic action than Brown did, by nationalising the banks, with higher social protection for the unemployed and more state intervention, squeezing parties on their left by turning leftwards. How Sarko railed against the "dictatorship of the market", while Brown missed the bloody mood and apologised to the CBI for the "regrettable" 50p tax rate. He failed to seize the anti-bonus, anti-banker spirit of the times that should have been Labour's moment.

What exactly is radical or leftwing about Gordon Brown?

His private finance initiative projects, his ill-advised public-private partnership for the tube, abolition of the 10p tax rate to give a tax break to higher earners, 42-day detention without trial, ID cards and springing a Trident replacement with no discussion on future foreign policy? Every time the rightwing press suggests he is betraying Blair's modernising agenda, he does something to prove it's not true, such as the third runway at Heathrow.

Why is the Daily Mail's Paul Dacre a frequent family visitor?Under Brown's chancellorship, Britain became yet more unequal, and the child poverty target was abandoned. All the "golden years" GDP growth went for the rich few, not for the many. Of course Brown did not intend that, but he never had the political courage to make the tough choices that would have sent money flowing away from the rich towards the rest.

To govern from the left requires a bravery he lacked to face down the power of money.

Imagine a new leader stepping out in July who says this: "Friends, there will be an election and a referendum on constitutional reform. I relinquish the injustice of the prime minister choosing the date: from now on elections will always be on the first Sunday in May, with fixed parliaments. Before then, we will clean up expenses and every sitting Labour MP will undergo reselection. A convention on the constitution and on liberty will bring in clean party funding: democracy will not be in hock to the whim of millionaires. We will have an elected Lords, sweep away obscurantist flummery in the Commons and devolve more powers. This parliament that made a mess of things must clean it up before it goes. A referendum on proportional representation deserves time for the arguments to be put fairly.”

“All we do from now on will be for cleaner, greener and fairer government. I will apologise for things we have done wrong, so you may better believe me when I boast of all we have done well. There is much to be proud of, and much that will be put at risk if we don't sing the praises of the considerable good Labour has done: Sure Start is just one emblem. Don't let anyone say the money was wasted or that the state should be shrunk. We stand for all the important things in life that we can only buy together – health, education, safe streets, beautiful parks and the long fight to stop climate change."

That's not so hard is it? But Brown can't and won't do it.

I still doubt the Labour party is so useless that it will let Brown lead them to destruction at the next election.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jun/08/gordon-brown-leadership-labour-party?commentpage=1
-------------------------------------------------------

Under this article there were two superb CIF comments which deserve wider dissemination:


By boonery

I think I am finally reconciled to Ms Toynbee, all criticism forgotten, because her article is one of such despair, all the more potent for being resisted for so long. For month after month, she has returned to the fray, ever optimistic that the situation might turn around, that things would get better, desperate to believe that someone – Blair, Brown, Milband, Johnson – would allow her party will rediscover its soul.

Now she seems to have accepted the simple truth: it wont happen. Its too late. The Labour party – her Labour party – has gone, probably for ever, consumed by the egotism and lust for power of those people who took it over when John Smith died. There are no differences between Blairites and Brownites; they are merely power factions battling it out. There are no ideas for making Britain a better, fairer place; they are irrelevant. If talk about light regulation is needed, it will be spoken. If talk about equality is necessary, then that too will be uttered. But the words have no meaning, beyond their usefulness in gulling the foolish.

The old party – always confused, never really socialist, but on the side of the angels and invariably pointing in more or less the right direction – signed a pact with the devil and gave up its soul to win elections. From then on Blair and Brown gutted it of principles and purpose, and turned it into a machine whose sole purpose was to keep them in place. It has done its job, but we have little of substance to show for it, beyond a surveillance state, a wrecked economy, a political system held in contempt, and an immoral war which has dragged our good name in the mud.

Some in the Labour party – Ms Toynbee amongst them, perhaps, but also those in the Parliamentary party who remain decent, idealistic public servants -- now see how they have been tricked out of their dreams, had their best intentions exploited for cynical ends. They should have everyone's sympathy, even of their opponents, because they hoped, and had those hopes trampled in the mud by crueler, lesser people.

But it is over, and what Blair and Brown between them have done should never be forgiven. They have not only betrayed the ideals of good people who followed them, they have destabilised the entire political system. They have taken a magnificent political tradition which stretched back a century, which embodied the noblest sentiments of fairness and equality, and corrupted it for their own gain. What is left is a name, and a memory. Nothing else.

The magnitude of the tragedy cannot be easily summed up. Even the Conservatives will suffer. There will almost certainly now be a Conservative government with a large majority, and that will doom Cameron as well. For 30 years we have lurched from one huge majority to another, and every time such excessive power has corrupted those who held it, and weakened Parliament and the democratic system. The Conservative party needs a strong Labour party or it will make the same mistakes, every bit as much as Labour was ultimately tempted into arrogance by the implosion of the Conservatives.

Cameron will not be strong enough to resist the temptation to use the power Brown will allow him to take. For Browns final gift will be to ensure that Labour has no chance of providing any serious opposition to what comes next.

---------------------------------------------------

By guardianreeda

Most of the labour MPs, and pretty much every character hoping to be elevated to leader, has happily voted for the policies which buried the promises given by Labour in 1997.

I voted in 1997 for whiter than white government. What we got was corruption, cash for laws, dodgy donations, MP fraud and serial flipping.

I voted in 1997 for an ethical foreign policy.

I voted in 1997 for fiscal prudence.

I voted in 1997 for electoral reform and a restoration of local democracy. I didn't realise at the time that this meant filling the cabinet with unelected yes men.

I voted in 1997 for an integrated public transport network, not endless Heathrow expansion.

I voted in 1997 for a profound reduction in class sizes and free education for those who want it.

I didn't vote for corrupt sales of aircraft to extremist Muslim dictatorships. I didn't vote for super casinos. I didn't vote for idiotic illegal unwinnable wars. I didn't vote for an erosion of civil liberties. I didn't vote for spiraling obsession with identity politics, idiotic league tables for schools, endless NHS reforms and reforms of reforms, dodgy off-balance-sheet PFI deals, endless spiraling debt, the walking away from the responsibility of regulating the banks, and I didn't vote for cabinet ministers to defraud the taxpayer.

Get rid of Brown - a good first step.

The second step is to get rid of anyone who didn't understand what was so compelling about the promises made in 1997.

------------------------------------------------------------

On Radio 4 this morning Professor Michael Sandel gave the first of his Reith Lectures:

New Citizenship
Michael Sandel
Reith Lecture

We need to think afresh.

We must foster spiritual values and ask ethical questions – construct a moral system as part of our citizenship.

A new USA president is taking new directions. (end of the neo-cons, market worship and the shock doctrine)

We need to consider ideas about morality and politics and justice.

We must return to fundamental values – economics doesn't question these.

We're in a time of financial crisis and economic crisis – the need is pressing.

A time for civic and moral renewal.

Public outrage at what's been happening in civic and public life.

We need a politics oriented towards the pursuit of the common good, not individual gain.

We need to ask what it really means to be a citizen.
We need a robust public discourse that engages with moral and spiritual values.

We need to reinvigorate public discourse about the common good.

We need to rethink the role of markets – and the moral limits of markets.
We're experiencing the economic fallout of a huge financial crisis.
We're at the end of an era of market fundamentalism and a mania for deregulation.

Markets cannot be the mechanism for achieving the public good.

More than regulation we need to rethink the role of markets.

We need to reconnect markets with values.

Greed and irresponsible risk-taking must be replaced with responsibility, trust & integrity.
We need to return to proper personal values – and think about the effect of markets running amok.
Markets always run on self-interest & greed.

Conservatives have always claimed there's some sort of moral alchemy of markets. Plainly this is bollocks. (I'm paraphrasing.)

We need the restoration of integrity.
We have to rethink the role of markets and keep them in their place.

Some things money can't buy.
Other things that money can buy and shouldn't.

We've seen the expansion of markets into spheres governed by non-market norms – education, health, policing, the military. (all of this in line with neo-con shock doctrine)

Some are now advocating paying kids to get good scores on standardised tests and paying kids to read books. Some are even saying we should sell citizenship to those who can best afford to pay.
All of this is bollocks.

Markets embody certain norms.
They leave their mark on social norms.
So where do markets belong and where should they be kept at a distance?

Monetary incentives undermine intrinsic incentives.
Market mechanisms become market norms.
There's a corruption of real incentives.

Consider the issue of fees v fines.
Should we allow countries to pay their way out of reducing greenhouse gasses? Would that be a fine or a fee?
Should we buy and sell the right to pollute?
This is ridiculous. What we need is a new set of attitudes.

Some things in life are corrupted and degraded if they are turned into commodities.
(eg SATs? Sell your soul, cram the kids, do to them “whatever works” to raise test scores, and pay the schools in Level 4s and 5s. Fine those who don't score high by labeling them failures and forcing them to change their educational philosophy, and even sacking their senior managers.)

We need to bring moral and spiritual norms into public discourse.

“Efficiency” cannot be the only thing we take into account.

(The need to consider these ideas as though they're something new tells us all we need to know about what a dumb society we've become. Political, social and philosophical thinkers understood all this centuries ago - Rousseau, Marx, Engels, Thomas More)

Cultivating a shared life and a shared citizenship.

Altruism and civic spirit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Sandel
http://www.newstatesman.com/philosophy/2009/06/public-philosophy-moral-sandel
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/feb/05/michael-sandel-reith-lectures-radio-4


Justice - A Journey in Moral Reasoning

This link might take a while to download because it's a video of Prof Sandel 'lecturing' to a vast hall of students at Harvard, and contains clips of students commenting on the impact of the session(s) and his style of 'delivery'. It's also a superb example of what great, interactive teaching should be all about:

http://athome.harvard.edu/programs/jmr/
.

Friday, January 16, 2009

Layer 114 Miliband and the School Bully, the Dracula Tendency, Results Factories, and Evil Spawn.

.
So our youthful-looking Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, has finally had the nerve to say publicly that Bush’s idea of a “War on Ter’r” is a load of nonsense, extremely unhelpful, counterproductive, etc, and he’s pleased that Obama is going to close Guantanamo Bay. It’s a bit like a child who’s heard that the playground bully has been expelled from the school, who then turns round and starts telling everyone he never really liked George and didn’t really want to be his mate and his henchman when he was going round beating everybody up. He knew it was a bad thing to do. In fact he now wants to talk to everybody and be their friend.

Well maybe it’s true that NuLabour hasn’t actually used the phrase “War on Terror” since 2006, as has been reported on TV and in the press, but it’s a bit late in the day to come out and draw attention to the fact that it was an imbecilic concept, and an excuse for bullying on a global scale. And it’s a bit late in the day to start saying we need to have a proper dialogue with those who take issue with the Shock Doctrine, or those who oppose the voodoo economics known as globalisation, those who reject neo-colonialism, etc.

Yes, of course it’s better late than never to make these statements, but Miliband must surely see that he, and NuLabour Mark II, just look stupid and pathetic, like they’re clinging to the coat tails of, and going along with, whoever’s the current big beast in the jungle.

Obama had the courage to say from the very start that the idea of a War on Terror was wrong-headed, and that invading Iraq was just plain wrong, for a variety of reasons. That took real courage and integrity - speaking truth to power, especially when the vast majority of Americans just went along with their government’s propaganda and their thirst for instant revenge for the Twin Towers. Such a pity that the Blair/Brown axis and NuLabour couldn’t manage it.

And neither could Miliband, at the time it was happening. Having been a close aid to Blair in Downing Street for so many years, and obviously politically very ambitious, he calculated that his political career was best served by deferring to his master and keeping schtum. And now he thinks the time is right to admit that it was a stupid concept and a useless policy. After all, George has already come out and said it was a mistake!

He’s been a silly boy, young David.. He was flattered by Blair’s patronage, and the nepotism he enjoyed, as Blair and then Brown gave him one promotion after another and facilitated his meteoric rise within the government. He should have been more patient, had the courage of his convictions, trusted in his innate ability to give him success in his political career in the long run, and he should have shown that he had the integrity and courage to speak truth to power, because now he can never achieve the stature of an Obama. Never, ever.

He ought to have realised that showing your integrity by speaking the truth will always be a requirement for anyone who aspires to be a true statesman, rather than a party apparatchik. He should have understood that in the long run you forfeit the trust and the support of the people if you even once participate as a member of the dominant mob, the gang of the playground bully, and fail to show that your conscience is your sole master.

He was no conscientious objector. He has the blood and the ruined lives of thousands of innocent people on his hands. Probably hundreds of thousands. And there’s no going back from that. He’s probably a very nice man. But he was a political prat.

Only 4 more days to Obama’s inauguration.

-------------------------------------------

The Dracula Tendency

The Guardian’s science correspondent reports that Victorian novels helped us to evolve into nicer people, according to scientists:

“Their research suggests that classic British novels from the 19th century not only reflect the values of Victorian society, they also shaped them. Archetypal novels from the period extolled the virtues of an egalitarian society and pitted cooperation and affability against individuals' hunger for power and dominance. For example in George Eliot's Middlemarch, Dorothea Brooke turns her back on wealth to help the poor, while Bram Stoker's nocturnal menace, Count Dracula, comes to represent the worst excesses of aristocratic dominance.

They found that leading characters fell into groups that mirrored the cooperative nature of a hunter-gatherer society, where individual urges for power and wealth were suppressed for the good of the community.


The effect of such moralistic literature was to uphold and instil a sense of fairness and altruism in society at large, the researchers claim in the journal Evolutionary Psychology. "By enforcing these norms, humans succeed in controlling 'free riders' or 'cheaters' and they thus make it possible for genuinely altruistic genes to survive within a social group," they write.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jan/14/victorian-novels-evolution-altruism

In this context I suppose David Miliband could be seen as a sort of miniature and somewhat youthful Heathcliffe, or even a non-charismatic Mr Darcy - a conflicted character, admired by some, but struggling to cope with both good and bad traits.

-------------------------------------------

Results Factories

Meanwhile NuLabour’s mismanagement of education grinds remorselessly onward. Polly Curtis, the Guardian’s education editor, reports that schools have been accused of ‘hot housing’ to get results. Tell us something we didn’t already know, dear Polly.

Apparently figures released yesterday reveal a leap in the numbers of pupils who took their exams early in November, thereby allowing a resit for any failures - “a tactic that is being encouraged increasingly across the country by heads desperate to rise in the league tables.”

"Some pupils have taken the same GCSE exam up to three times in the space of a year, the Guardian has learned.

Teachers' leaders have blamed the government's pressure on headteachers to improve results and move up the school league tables for the increased focus on exams that was putting children under stress and detracting from the depth of their learning.

Last year the government announced that any schools where fewer than 30% of pupils achieved at least five good GCSEs - including in English and maths - faced closure unless there were improvements within three years.

Alan Smithers, professor of education at Buckingham University, said: "League tables have got all out of proportion and schools will now do all they can to improve their place. Early entry is one way they are doing it. Other ways include focusing on the pupils on the C-D border. We're in danger of producing a set of statistics that no longer accurately reflect pupils' progression but the work the schools can do to improve their scores."


Perry Beeches school in Birmingham has adopted early entry for its entire GCSE group, with nearly all of its pupils sitting their English exams a year early and maths six months early. The pupils were allowed to retake, or sit a harder paper to improve their result.

Liam Nolan, the school's head, said: "We are an exam factory, I have no issue with that. However, this is about the students. They've got to pass these exams to give themselves every opportunity in life."

John Bangs, head of education at the National Union of Teachers, said: "Retakes are bad for kids. There's a poisonous combination of parental pressure and league-table pressure to get as high a score as possible. There are kids who are ready to take their exams early but it should be on the basis of their readiness rather than part of a process to get the results.

"What it does is focus on the examination results rather than the use of English and maths across the curriculum - it's for the sake of the exam itself ... examination result-driven decisions to hot-house kids into taking an exam early are damaging."

A DCSF spokesperson said, “We are not aware of widespread issues with students being unduly pushed to take GCSEs early”.

Well now that you ARE aware of it - what ARE you going to do about it, you bastards?

We know what they’ll do about it. Nothing. They don’t give a shit about the wellbeing of pupils What they’re continuing to do is bully and threaten schools with closure if they don’t meet their government-set targets. So why shouldn’t the schools feel comfortable with being branded as results factories? That’s all they are. At least that headteacher had the integrity to admit it, even if he is a total tosser for engaging with the very idea.

Yesterday Ed Balls repeated what his illustrious macho predecessor Blunkett said all those years ago - poverty is no excuse for failure, and failure to reach the government’s targets will result in the closure of schools and the sacking of their staff. Fucking Stalinist. His lapdog Jim Knight, our schools’ minister, predictably yapped on about “the excuses culture”.

I can’t wait to see these arseholes disappear into well-deserved obscurity. There can’t be any excuses now for failure to promote the real interests and the wellbeing of pupils. Hot housing and a failure to understand how to run a decent education system cannot be excused. They’ve had 11 years to learn from the likes of Finland and Denmark how to promote real education and the professionalism of teachers. They’ve learned nothing at all, the dullards. All we have is more Blunkettism, and Stalinist demands to meet production targets. These people are evil spawn of the devil, and no mistake.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/jan/15/schools-tables-exams
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/jan/15/secondaryschools-schooltables
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jan/16/ed-balls-academies-exam-results
------------------------------------------

More Evil Spawn

Talking of which, we learned yesterday that Israel’s armed forces managed to blow up and destroy the one place in Gaza they really didn’t want to hit - a relief warehouse within the United Nations compound in which there was a huge store of humanitarian supplies - mainly food and medicine. There also happened to be 200 refugees within the compound. An Israeli spokesman admitted this was a mistake, but said something along the lines of, “Oh well, these things happen. Our soldiers are under a lot of pressure, you know.”

Actually, they said it was a “grave mistake”. Pity it’s not their own graves they’re talking about. This is actually the only thing the Israeli hard-liners care about - having to dig the graves of their own soldiers. Nothing else impacts on their attitude or their tactics. The recent attack on Lebanon proved this, when heavy casualties caused by well-armed militias forced their withdrawal.

The United Nations are said to be furious about this latest incident. It’s going to be interesting to see what action they take, because some sort of action is surely now inevitable. They’ve already passed a resolution calling for a ceasefire, and Israel’s taken no notice of it, as we knew would happen. So what happens next?
.