Showing posts with label living wage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label living wage. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Layer 391 . . . Hislop, Do-Gooders, Radicals, Utopians, Reformers, Education and Schools

.
This week saw the beginning of a new TV series made by the ever-lovable and naughty-but-nice Ian Hislop.

This excellent review tells it like it is:

Ian Hislop’s Age of Do-Gooders Review: Have I Got Do-Gooders For You!

http://channelhopping.onthebox.com/2010/11/29/ian-hislops-age-of-do-gooders-review-have-i-got-do-gooders-for-you/

Ian Hislop unpeels from his well-grooved seat on Have I Got News for You this week to deliver the first of an eye opening series about the moral supermen (and women) whose social influence on modern Britain has been too often overlooked. These historic ‘Do-Gooders’ are not the notable politicians or army generals we already know about (or should know), but the restlessly forward thinkers and social campaigners that have brought moral substance to British society as we now see it.

With boyish enthusiasm, Hislop takes us on a ride into class-split Victorian life starting with Wilberforce, the great campaigner who fought against slavery; to Robert Owen, who turned a mill factory from a bone crushing sweatshop into something a bit less like a sweatshop; Thomas Wakley, who exposed the downright idiocy of contemporary medical practice; moral crusader George Dawson, who made Brummies take responsibility; right up to pioneering social worker Octavia Hill, the true life Mary Poppins who reinvented social work by managing hundreds of homes for poor families.

Documenting the progression of thought is hard to pull off well, especially when the achievements are not always tangible. Hislop charts these quiet revolutionaries with vigour, drawing light parallels to issues of corruption and neglected responsibility we face today . . . This is actually pretty important stuff, when you think about it.

Watching the programme I was most struck by the work and ideals of Robert Owen, and his New Lanark mill, institute and schools.

Here's a man who was considered by his contemporaries to be too radical and 'utopian', but whose spiritual intelligence made him original, creative, humane, decent and empathetic. As Hislop pointed out, he recognised that "the market" is not an incredibly benign force. He therefore created decent accommodation for his employees, and also built schools for their children.

And not just any old schools either. He insisted on the curriculum being based on the development of all of the intelligences, as we might now say. He wanted children to learn how to get along with one another, how to share things, how to show kindness, and so on. All the things we'd now call personal, emotional, social and spiritual intelligence. In Owen's schools the arts, including music and dancing, had a central place.

Clearly these are things that other Victorian industrialists like Cadbury tried to do. The nearest we get to it these days is when employers decide to be a bit less stingy and pay people like cleaners and clerical assistants a 'living wage', instead of just a 'minimum wage'.

More info on Robert Owen here:

http://www.infed.org/thinkers/et-owen.htm

Robert Owen's educational venture at New Lanark helped to pioneer infant schools and was an early example of what we now recognize as community schooling. Yet education  was only a single facet of a more powerful social gospel which already preached community building on the New Lanark model as a solution to contemporary evils in the wider world.

Robert Owen (1771-1858), social and educational reformer, remains a controversial and enigmatic figure. Having profited enormously from enterprise in the early Industrial Revolution he set about trying to remedy its excesses through environmental, educational, factory and poor law reform. Synthesizing reformist ideas from the Age of Enlightenment and drawing on his own experience as an industrialist he constructed A New View of Society (1816), a rallying call for widespread social change, with education at its core. New Lanark, the test-bed for his ideas, became internationally famous.

Robert Owen continued his . . . campaign by promoting labour exchanges, consumer co-operatives, trade unions and other Owenite organisations. By the 1830s the man had become a movement headed by Owen as Social Father. Always education, for what Robert Owen was by then calling the New Moral World, was central to his thinking.

..............................................................

Wikipedia says this about Owen:

Robert Owen (14 May 1771 – 17 November 1858) was a Welsh social reformer and one of the founders of socialism and the cooperative movement.

Owen's philosophy was based on three intellectual pillars:

    * First, no one was responsible for his will and his own actions because his whole character is formed independently of himself; people are products of their environment, hence his support for education and labour reform, rendering him a pioneer in human capital investment.
    * Second, all religions are based on the same ridiculous imagination, that make man a weak, imbecile animal; a furious bigot and fanatic; or a miserable hypocrite; (though in his later years he embraced Spiritualism).
    * Third, support for the putting-out system instead of the factory system.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Owen

Very strange - that suggestion that by embracing "Spiritualism" Owen was somehow veering back towards religiosity, whereas he was clearly trying to develop ideas about the nature of the human spirit and spiritual intelligence, without any need to believe in God or super-human deities.

..........................................................

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/IRowen.htm

With the financial support of several businessmen from Manchester, Owen purchased Dale's four textile factories in New Lanark for £60,000. Under Owen's control, the Chorton Twist Company expanded rapidly. However, Robert Owen was not only concerned with making money, he was also interested in creating a new type of community at New Lanark. Owen believed that a person's character is formed by the effects of their environment. Owen was convinced that if he created the right environment, he could produce rational, good and humane people. Owen argued that people were naturally good but they were corrupted by the harsh way they were treated. For example, Owen was a strong opponent of physical punishment in schools and factories and immediately banned its use in New Lanark.

David Dale had originally built a large number of houses close to his factories in New Lanark. By the time Owen arrived, over 2,000 people lived in New Lanark village. One of the first decisions took when he became owner of New Lanark was to order the building of a school. Owen was convinced that education was crucially important in developing the type of person he wanted.

When Owen arrived at New Lanark children from as young as five were working for thirteen hours a day in the textile mills. He stopped employing children under ten and reduced their labour to ten hours a day. The young children went to the nursery and infant schools that Owen had built. Older children worked in the factory but also had to attend his secondary school for part of the day.

Owen's partners were concerned that these reforms would reduce profits. Unable to convince them of the wisdom of these reforms, Owen decided to borrow money from Archibald Campbell, a local banker, in order to buy their share of the business. Later, Owen sold shares in the business to men who agreed with the way he ran his factory.

......................................................

http://www.robert-owen.com/

Robert Owen was a man ahead of his time. During his lifetime, he endeavoured to improve the health, education, well-being and rights of the working class. This driving ambition to create a better society for all took him around the world, from a small mill village in Lanarkshire in Scotland to New Harmony, Indiana in America with varied success. Although, he encountered much criticism and opposition in his lifetime, he influenced reformers who came after him and many of his views are as relevant and resonate today in their modernity and progressive nature.

A Model Community

Under Robert Owen’s management from 1800 to 1825, the cotton mills and village of New Lanark became a model community, in which the drive towards progress and prosperity through new technology of the Industrial Revolution was tempered by a caring and humane regime. This gained New Lanark an international reputation for the social and educational reforms Owen implemented.

New Lanark had the first Infant School in the world, a creche for working mothers, free medical care, and a comprehensive education system for children, including evening classes for adults. Children under 10 were not allowed to work in the Mill.

Leisure and recreation were not forgotten; there were concerts, dancing, music-making and pleasant landscaped areas for the benefit of the community.

When Owen opened the Institute for the Formation of Character, which was effectively a community education centre for his workers, he outlined his visionary plans for an astonishingly progressive and enlightened system of education which he believed was the key to a happier society, and universal harmony.

"What ideas individuals may attach to the term "Millennium" I know not; but I know that society may be formed so as to exist without crime, without poverty, with health greatly improved, with little, if any misery, and with intelligence and happiness increased a hundredfold; and no obstacle whatsoever intervenes at this moment except ignorance to prevent such a state of society from becoming universal.”

- Extract from Robert Owen’s "Address to the Inhabitants of New Lanark"
New Year’s Day, 1816

Nearly 200 years further on, and have we yet achieved a society without crime, without poverty, without misery, and with intelligence and happiness increased a hundredfold? I think not. Ignorance still rules, OK?
.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Layer 356 . . . Cocks, Roosters, Ed Miliband and the New Leader's Speech . . .

.
Hazel Bleeding Blears was on the Daily Politics show panel today, chatting with the Neil Scotsperson. I've no idea why.

In the leadership contest it seems she voted for the other three guys in the contest ahead of Ed Mili. Interesting. Clearly, for Hazel, New Labour isn't 'over'.

....................................................

Cocking It Up

Boost for Ed Miliband as new poll puts Labour ahead of the Conservatives

As Ed Miliband prepares to give his first major speech as party leader, a new poll shows support for Labour on 40% compared with 39% for the Conservatives



Hmmmm. So who is this Ed Miliband? Does anybody really know him? Oxzen's exclusive research has come up the following personality profile.

Ed is a Cock. Or Rooster if you prefer. Such people are found in professions where security is assured without excessive risk-taking. Deep down they are extremely conservative. Oh dear.

It seems Roosters are dandies who feel that appearance is everything in life.

What's more, Ed, being born in 1969, is an Earth Rooster. This means that this particular Cock is egotistical, and preoccupied with his own success, security and appearance. He's happy to profit from other people's work, and is not overly imaginative. And he's realistic, pragmatic and shrewd rather than creatively intelligent, insightful, enlightened, visionary, radical or imaginative . So much for Red Ed.

So far, so New Labour. So very Blair/Brown.

And it goes on. Due to his egotism, he's not burdened with too many principles. Earth Roosters rapidly climb to the top in their profession, especially in politics, property and banking, not hesitating to elbow others out of the way. These people need activities that flatter their pride while assuring them of fame and comfort. They need to be seen and admired.

As it happens, Ed is also a Capricorn, and all of the above can also be said of most Capricorns. So now we know. You read it here first, folks!

I'll continue.

The Rooster is the incarnation of the forces of youth, hope and clarity. "With his mixture of conformity and eccentricity, aggressive impulses and meditative leanings, the Rooster is a rather strange and paradoxical animal. This captive king is a bizarre and contraDicTory creature (my emphasis), a ruler and a slave whose bravery and despotism are confined by the narrow limits of his farmyard. In this sense the Rooster is an analogy for the frailties of prestige and power, confined within the inevitable enclosure of time and death."

Honest, frank, obliging, courageous, vain, thoughtless, preoccupied with appearance.

Hates any attempt to probe his private being or expose his motives.

"Sooner or later one begins to question whether the Rooster superficiality is real or a game. The answer is that they conceal their inner selves with near desperation, obstinately camouflaging their lack of inner confidence the fact that, at bottom, they are only fragile birds. What remains of a Rooster when one takes away his feathers and his cock-a-doodle-do?"

We shall see.

On the positive side - "Rooster/Capricorn is just and full of integrity. he is also the most hard-working and clear-sighted of all the Roosters."

Which is all very well, but the likes of Thatcher, Blair and Brown were also hard-working. The question is - to what ends?

.........................................................................

The Big Speech

Ed walked into the conference hall hand in hand with his partner - with her bump, and her tragic haircut. A purple tie day.

More boring displays of brotherly love. More silly grins from his bro. Hello Ed! - We don't fucking care about your family and your sibling history! You've said too much already!

Tedious tributes to Darling and Straw. Dullards and hacks. Visionaries - not.

"The new generation of Labour is different."

"Why I'm here. It starts with my dad. His escape from the Nazis. His family arrived in Britain with nothing. They worked hard and got on. My dad learnt English. He joined the navy to fight for Britain.

Secure and loving homes. The aspiration to succeed. People of courage and conviction can make a huge difference. We do not have to accept the world as we find it. Never walk by on the other side of injustice.

Freedom and opportunity are precious gifts. My values are my anchor. My sense of right and wrong. Dedication, energy and the determination of activists makes the difference.

But we had a very bad election result. Now we're out of power and we cannot change our country for the better. We must make sure this is a one-term government.

But we need humility. We should blame ourselves, not the electorate. This will require strong leadership. And lead I will.

Tony and Gordon took on conventional wisdom. They were reforming, restless and radical. They lifted hundreds of thousands of children out of poverty. Newly-built schools and modernised hospitals. Saviours of the National Health Service. We helped deliver peace in Northern Ireland.

Development spending around the world. Working for malaria eradication.

Tony and Gordon had the courage to take on Establishment attitudes. But where did we go wrong - how did we lose so many votes.?

Trapped by our own certainties? Over time we looked more and more like an old Establishment. Failure to re-regulate the City. Immigration. Personal debt. Tuition fees. Claims of having ended boom and bust. The scandal of MP's expenses. Our style of politics and our remoteness from the people.

We cannot claim we know all the answers. But we have to set a new direction. We know there's more to life than work and money. Foreign policy must be based on our values.

To change Britain we need a new politics. We need to build a new economy. We need to reduce the deficit. We need to win back fiscal credibility.

We were too exposed to financial services. We should take responsibility for not building a more resilient economy. Growth should now be our priority. We should go on rebuilding schools. We need to lead the world in new technology. No plan for growth means no credible plan for deficit reduction.

We need a higher banking levy to protect the services that people rely on. We need an economy and a society fit for our kids to live in.

My ambition is for us to learn deeper lessons about changing our economy for the future. There are too many people stuck in low pay. We must redistribute prosperity. Labour must be the party of enterprise and small businesses.

We did not do enough to address the concerns about globalisation and its consequences - wages driven down by immigration. Those consequences should have been dealt with. Migrant labour should never have been allowed to undercut people's wages. We need proper protection for agency workers. Workers need to make their voices heard. Basic standards of decency and fairness. Trade unions are part of a decent society.

But we need to win the public to our cause - not alienate them through irresponsible strikes.

And we also need responsibility from business. Decent wages. Living wages. Fair pay. Not just a 'minimum'. A living wage must be the foundation of our economy in the future.

High quality apprenticeships.

The gap between rich and poor DOES matter. What does it say about the values of our society? Excessive salaries must be challenged. The lives of the poor can be transformed. Those in need must be protected.

Work is central to life - but it's not all that matters. Strong families, love and compassion, time with our families. Do we just know the price of everything and the value of nothing? We must shed old thinking.

Post Office closures? Identikit high streets? We believe in community and social solidarity. How do we protect families? People working 60 - 70 hours a week - how does this help kids?

How do we think about the State, and what it can achieve? Government must be accountable and responsive.

Flannel flannel comprehensive schools flannel flannel failing schools flannel flannel.

Civil liberties must never be given away lightly. Protecting freedoms.

The new generation must challenge old thinking in foreign policy.

Our boys in Afghanistan . . . thanks. Stabilising the country. Supporting our mission.

But Iraq! I criticise nobody - but I do believe we were wrong. War was not a LAST resort.

Our alliance with America . . . Our values . . . International support for the problems in the Middle East. Israel must accept and recognise the Palestinian right to statehood. The attack on the Gaza flotilla was wrong!

We must change our politics - its practice, its workings, and its reputation. Vote yes to AV! Fully elect the House of Lords! More local democracy and decision-making.

Protecting the environment.

Working with the other parties. Praise for Liberals like Keynes and Beveridge. And  Ken Clark on prisons. Teresa May on stop and search.

Let's have a grown up debate about ourselves and our country - not silly name calling.

A difference in attitudes and ideals to the Tories. Optimism! Let's be humble about the past, and inspire people with our vision.

.........................................

He spoke well. His delivery was good. His voice is not unpleasant. Infinitely better than Blair or Brown. A decent effort. And he might well get better.


He deserves support AT LEAST for what he said about inequality, the gap between rich and poor,  re-regulating the City and financial services, values, work-life balance, civil liberties, Palestine, Iraq, support for the Alternative Vote, creating new businesses and industries, and above all redistributing prosperity, tackling low pay, and introducing a living wage.

This is indeed a new beginning. Bye bye New Labour. Well done Ed.
.